
A grounded guide for coaches
Every coach, at some point, encounters someone who leaves the session feeling heavier than it began.
The conversation feels circular.
Emotions escalate quickly.
Resistance shows up as silence, defensiveness, or intellectual debate.
Boundaries are tested.
Progress feels slow — or invisible.
It’s common to label these situations internally as working with a “challenging client.” But the moment we do that, we risk missing what’s actually happening.
At Coach on Tap, we believe that challenge in coaching is rarely about the person being “difficult.” More often, it’s about what the system — coach, coachee, context — is surfacing together.
This article explores how to work skillfully, ethically, and sustainably when coaching feels challenging — without blaming, rescuing, or burning out.

If coaching were only about insight and ease, anyone could do it.
Challenge appears when:
someone is facing discomfort they’ve long avoided
identity or self-image is being questioned
stakes feel high (career, leadership, reputation)
emotions surface faster than language
progress threatens existing coping strategies
In other words, challenge often signals meaningful work, not failure.
The question is not how to eliminate challenge, but how to meet it without losing presence, boundaries, or effectiveness.

Before responding, it helps to recognize patterns without judgment.
Some common experiences include:
Someone who:
resists questions or dismisses reflection
intellectualizes instead of feeling
repeatedly avoids agreed actions
externalizes responsibility (“they,” “the system,” “circumstances”)
becomes emotionally reactive or shuts down
expects advice, reassurance, or rescue
These behaviors are not random. They are protective strategies — often developed long before coaching began.
Seeing them as such changes how we respond.

The most important work often happens inside the coach.
Challenging dynamics trigger coaches too:
frustration
self-doubt
impatience
the urge to fix
the urge to withdraw
the fear of “not being effective”
Before intervening, pause and ask:
What am I feeling right now?
What story am I telling about this person?
What does this reaction say about me?
Your internal state shapes the session more than any technique.
If you feel contracted, the space contracts.
If you stay grounded, the space stabilizes.

It’s easy to unconsciously personalize resistance.
Instead of:
“They’re uncoachable.”
Try:
“This pattern is protecting something important.”
When you see behavior as information rather than obstruction, curiosity replaces judgment.
For example:
Resistance may protect autonomy
Silence may protect vulnerability
Intellectualization may protect emotional safety
Control may protect identity
Your role is not to dismantle defenses forcefully — but to make them visible and workable.

One of the most powerful interventions is process reflection.
This means naming what you observe in the moment, without interpretation or blame.
Examples:
“I notice we’re circling the same point — what feels hard to move into here?”
“I see a lot of thinking happening right now — what’s happening emotionally as we talk?”
“I notice some hesitation — what might you be protecting?”
This brings the dynamic into shared awareness, where it can be explored safely.
Avoid:
diagnosing
labeling
assuming intent
Clarity without judgment builds trust.

Challenging moments often signal a gap in expectations.
It can be helpful to gently revisit:
the purpose of coaching
roles and responsibilities
what coaching is — and is not
Questions that help:
“What are you hoping coaching will do for you?”
“What feels within your control here?”
“What responsibility are you willing to take?”
This is not about pressure.
It’s about restoring agency.
Coaching cannot work if responsibility is outsourced entirely to the coach.

Not every situation requires pushing forward.
Sometimes, slowing down is the intervention:
staying with emotion
allowing silence
focusing on awareness rather than action
Other times, ethical coaching requires clear boundaries:
refusing to give advice
naming repeated avoidance
addressing lack of engagement
acknowledging misalignment
Both compassion and firmness are acts of respect.

Not every coaching relationship is meant to continue.
This is not failure. It’s professionalism.
Consider pausing or ending coaching when:
there is persistent misalignment of expectations
psychological safety cannot be established
the person consistently rejects the coaching role
another modality (therapy, consulting) is more appropriate
Ending well — with clarity and care — protects both parties.
“Challenging people” are often mirrors.
They reflect:
our edges
our assumptions
our unmet needs as coaches
our relationship with uncertainty and control
The work is not to make coaching easy —
but to make it honest, ethical, and human.
When you meet challenge with presence rather than force, you model the very capacity coaching seeks to build.
And sometimes, that is the most powerful intervention of all.